The bug to remove hsts from the sqlite permissions db, where it would have been easy to manage, doesn't say in initial comments why this was a good idea.
It doesn't seem to be a good sign, perhaps this is an in transition thing. If false, the window dialog still has them.
Plus, in Fx39 trunk, if is true, the default, the options to show cookies and exceptions and clear history settings seem to be removed, and the latter two's functionality is not found in about:preferences. However, this deletes any and all site cookie exception permissions, which is very inconvenient. The entries in SiteSecurityServiceState.txt can be cleared (on restart) if Privacy tab Clear History is checked, and in the Settings dialog Site Preferences is checked. This reduces credibility on a.firefox forum? No offense really, but come on. Patrickjdempsey wrote:I don't use Firefox Speaking of the subject of this very topic, IMO adding new modules/features/storage databases that may for their own nature present privacy/security risks and then wait for someone to file a bug it's not the right way to go: at the time this things are added, clear directions on how to disable/clear should be provided, all the better if from the GUI and not via some hidden setting or javascript trickery. While at the same time some bugs are waiting for ages to be fixed. Although, not entirely disconnected from reality when you considered the amount of bugs marked as " wontfix" or " invalid".īesides, I assume we have some right to whining, considering how much stuff is being constantly added to Firefox and -as a consequence of that- how many hidden settings we are forced to chase down in order to disable stuff that we don't need/want. Virtual_ManPL wrote:If you're that "optimistic" and don't even bother to talk to devs on IRC or even create a bug report, I don't understand the point this topic, when you're asking about something and next you give reply by yourself in your second post here or it's just whining thread?Ĭalm down, that was a joke.
0 kommentar(er)
